:: urbansheep (urbansheep) wrote,
:: urbansheep

  • Music:

[ L ] Пол Грэхэм о вкусе.


I was talking recently to a friend who teaches at MIT. His field is hot now and every year he is inundated by applications from would-be graduate students. "A lot of them seem smart," he said. "What I can't tell is whether they have any kind of taste."

Taste. You don't hear that word much now. And yet we still need the underlying concept, whatever we call it. What my friend meant was that he wanted students who were not just good technicians, but who could use their technical knowledge to design beautiful things.

Mathematicians call good work "beautiful," and so, either now or in the past, have scientists, engineers, musicians, architects, designers, writers, and painters. Is it just a coincidence that they used the same word, or is there some overlap in what they meant? If there is an overlap, can we use one field's discoveries about beauty to help us in another?

For those of us who design things, these are not just theoretical questions. If there is such a thing as beauty, we need to be able to recognize it. We need good taste to make good things. Instead of treating beauty as an airy abstraction, to be either blathered about or avoided depending on how one feels about airy abstractions, let's try considering it as a practical question: how do you make good stuff?


Довольно широко известна история, когда к Туполеву пришёл один инженер показывать чертежи новой машины. Туполев бегло просмотрел листы, и вынес вердикт — „это не взлетит“. „Андрей Николаевич, но почему? Как вы решили? Вы же даже не заглянули в рассчёты!“ — удивился проектировщик.

„Потому что это некрасиво“ — был ему ответ.

Live Journal User Rating
  • Post a new comment


    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded